We caught quite a few species. We didn't see any cats, but they tend not to shock as well as most fish. We saw very few smallmouth bass but the ones we did see were nice ones. If i remember right we only had 4 saugeye total and the biggest was 15". We saw a lot of yellow perch but none over 7". We also sampled the very north end of the resrvoir where the creek flows in, so we got a lot of species related to streams (ie. hogsucker, whitesucker, darters, minnow spp., etc.). The crappie were of good health but we didn't see any large ones, and the bluegill populations were very large but stunted (this was because of the large gizzard population). The gizzard shad were quite literally everywhere and a few carp over 5lb were shocked (big carp seem to skirt the electric field). Again, the largemouth were abundant and their average weight/length were above the ohio averages our biggest was around 3.5lb but with a LOT of 2lb fish. (keep in mind that of all the shocking I've ever done (a lot) I have never shocked a bass over 4lb.) We deemed the saugeye and perch stockings to be very unsuccessful.
Other notes: When you shock a lake you don't do the entire lake but instead try to focus on locations which will represent most of the lake habitat. We did 7 sites which were positioned throughout the lake. Shocking also gives a poor representation of deepwater species (ie. crappie, perch, etc.) Trap nets are a better for sampling species like these (we set up 3 trap nets on APL). It was also surprising to see what was shocked over certain habitat types and lake areas.
Whew! I'm beginning to think that I could be an APL guide! ha. Hope that answers some questions! Feel free with any others.
Norm